American unity and the national interest
Read Online
Share

American unity and the national interest speech, August 14, 1975, Birmingham, Alabama by Henry Kissinger

  • 28 Want to read
  • ·
  • 6 Currently reading

Published by U.S. Dept of State, Bureau of Public Affairs, Office of Media Services in [Washington] .
Written in English

Subjects:

  • United States -- Foreign relations.

Book details:

Edition Notes

StatementSecretary Henry A. Kissinger before the Southern Commodity Producers Conference.
SeriesPR ; 411
ContributionsUnited States. Dept. of State. Office of Media Services.
The Physical Object
Pagination7 p. ;
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL17515730M

Download American unity and the national interest

PDF EPUB FB2 MOBI RTF

As I think about our national paralysis, and the reasons for it, I find myself recalling George Washington’s farewell address—the letter he wrote to the American people in after deciding. Words6 Pages The Extent of American Unity and Identity Since early colonization the English colonies had always felt closer to England than to each other. In fact, it took a British newspaper less time to reach Savannah than a letter from Massachusetts.   National history and national pride are two other factors that can play into it national unity instead of just equal opportunity. For example, higher living standards, better economic opportunities, free speech, free press, cultural diffusion, and other reasons are things that contribute to American national pride and should never be dismissed.   1 For one version of this proposal, see Michael Brown, AnnMaura Connolly, Alan Khazei, Wendy Kopp, Michelle Nunn, Gregg Petersmeyer, Shirley Sagawa, and Harris Wofford, “A Call to National Service,” The American Interest (January-February ).

American Identity and Unity. Next Essay. Throughout the 17 th and 18 th centuries Americans developed a unique system of government with revolutionary ideals – never seen anywhere else before. Americans adopted representative governments with democratic principles that allowed each person to have a voice in the decisions about their country. the Vietnam War, national unity in the United States and American patriotism began to disintegrate and morph as the nation progressed from the s through the s. During WWII, the United States military fought a foe that the American public, and the world alike, saw as an enemy to the human race, which caused Americans to unify in their. It is not an oxymoron to find unity in individualism. Men and women who value their own lives and who respect the lives of others will benefit by trading goods and services with others and will be entertained, enlightened, and inspired by the plays, poetry, paintings, movies, music, scientific discoveries, engineering feats, and every other. A man who thinks of himself as belonging to a particular national group has not yet become an American.” remains on the books: Out of many, one. But the unity that we once prized is eroding.

"Era of Good Feelings" Leads to National Unity: For nearly a decade after the War of , America experienced some remarkable, unifying events. President James Monroe declared in his first inaugural address that "local jealousies are rapidly yielding to more generous, enlarged, and enlightened views of national policy.". Domestic conflict over how to define the "national interest" is the result. Challenging dominant accounts of American foreign policy-making, Defining the National Interest exemplifies how interdisciplinary scholarship can yield a deeper understanding of the connections between domestic and international change in an era of s: 2. National unity and integrity are essential to promote a country. The title name may appear similar with the saying 'where there is a will, there is a way'. We may call it a parody of the proverb or the saying. Whatever it is termed, my aim is to convey the message as to how integrity and. Book Description: Although the termnational interesthas long been used in reference to the foreign policy goals of nations, there has been no generally agreed upon definition of the concept; as a result, Donald E. Nuechterlein contends, there has been a tendency for foreign policy to be determined by institutional prejudice and past policy rather than by a systematic assessment of national.